RADHEY SHYAM Vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR CONSOLIDATION MEERUT

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY means of this writ petition the petitioners have prayed for quashing the judgment of the revisional court dated 10-11-1980.

(2.) IT is not disputed that the disputed chak no. 362 of village Khandawali was recorded in the name of Sukhdev The petitioners applied for mutation of their names in place of the deceased Sukhdev before the Assistant Consolidation Officer who accepted the claim of the petitioners and deleted the name of the deceased Sukhdev and ordered for entry of the names of the petitioners through his order dated 23-11-1978.

(3.) THE learned counsel for the petitioners contends before me that the revisional authority has patently erred in observing that the order dated 23-12-1978 passed by the Assistant Consolidation Officer could not be binding upon the consolidation officer and would be treated as void. He has also emphasized that no objection was filed by Mst. Kamlesh or any body before the Assistant Consolidation Officer, hence the revisional authority acted illegally in proceeding on the assumption that some objection filed on behalf of Mst. Kamlesh is pending before the Consolidation Officer.