GORAKH Vs. BOARD OF REVENUE U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a defendant's writ petition against the judgment of the second appellate court dated 10-5-1983.

(2.) THE plaintiff-opposite parties filed a suit under sections 59/180 of the U. P. Tenancy Act against the defendants petitioners on the allegations that the plaintiffs were occupancy tenants of the plots in suit and that the defendant was a Sajhi, but got certain revenue entries in his favour, hence asserting possession over the disputed land ; therefore, the necessity for the suit.

(3.) THE learned counsel for the petitioner has contended before me that the second appellate court has patently erred in interfering with the findings of fact recorded by the first appellate court and that it has patently erred in recording finding within four corners of the rulings mentioned in its judgment without discussing the evidence on record, hence its judgment should be quashed.