GAYATRI DEVI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the judgment of the learned Single Judge as also the Division Bench judgment in the case of Km. Seema v. State of U.P. and others, in Special Appeal No. 1565 of 2010 decided on 28.9.2010. The ratio of the aforesaid decision in relation to the period for which leave can be extended, is as follows:

(2.) Learned counsel for the appellant then contends that the benefit of the said judgment has to be extended keeping in view the operative portion of the said judgment.

(3.) Having considered the submissions raised, the ratio of the judgment which is applicable on the facts of the present case has been extracted here-in-above. In the aforesaid circumstances, the learned Single Judge has not committed any error in refusing to exercise discretion in favour of the appellant. There is no merit in the appeal.