BACHAIE Vs. D.D.C.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Shri S.C. Tripathi, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri S.S. Chauhan who appears for the respondents. The writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of prohibition prohibiting respondent No. 1 the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Jaunpur from entertaining the proceedings initiated by respondent No. 4 bearing Misc. Case Nos. 5 and 6 of 2014.

(2.) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioner submits that:

(3.) ON the applications filed, reports were called for, from the Assistant Consolidation Officer. The Assistant Consolidation Officer prepared a report including an adjustment chart, disturbing the petitioners chak and, this report has been sent directly to the Deputy Director of Consolidation when in fact it should have been forwarded to the Consolidation Officer who was required to forward it to the Settlement Officer, Consolidation who alone has jurisdiction to forward the same to the Deputy Director of Consolidation and the fact that this established procedure has been given a go by exhibits the mala fide intention of the Consolidation Authorities.