LAWS(ALL)-2014-9-232

VEDVYAS @ SATYAM YADAV Vs. STATE OF U P

Decided On September 15, 2014
Vedvyas @ Satyam Yadav Appellant
V/S
STATE OF U P Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner.

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of this disqualification even a nominated member, according to the aforesaid definition, stands disqualified.

(3.) A member is nominated in terms of Section 9(d) of the 1916 Act. This has to be read in terms of the General Clauses Act, which empowers the State Government to exercise powers of recall as it has the power of nomination. The nomination is by the State Government. Consequently, this disqualification has to be looked into by the State Government itself. The petitioner may, therefore, approach the respondent No. 1 alongwith a certified copy of this order and the respondent No. 1 shall proceed to examine the claim of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders after putting the respondent No. 6 to notice preferably within a period of three months' from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before him.