RAM AUTAR Vs. D D C

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri A.K. Sharma holding brief of Sri Manish Dev for the petitioner and Sri S.N. Singh for the respondents.

(2.) THE writ petition has been filed against the orders of Consolidation Officer dated 20.2.2013, Settlement Officer, Consolidation dated 7.10.2013 and Deputy Director of Consolidation dated 21.1.2014 passed in chak allotment proceedings.

(3.) THE counsel for the petitioner submits that the Consolidation Officer although recorded a finding that a single chak be allotted to the petitioner but in the amendment chart attached to the order of Consolidation Officer, only the second chak of the petitioner was abolished and its valuation has been allotted on plot no. 635 etc. The Settlement Officer, Consolidation has illegally remarked that plot no. 1088 was not the original holding of the petitioner and the Deputy Director of Consolidation has not accepted the case of the petitioner that his boring as well as trees were existed on plot no. 1088, only on the ground that in CH Form 2 A, the boring and trees were not noted. He submits that all the three consolidation authorities have dealt with the case of the petitioner in casual manner and without application of mind. In such circumstances, the orders of consolidation authorities are liable to be set aside.