AKHILESH TRIPATHI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner claims to be involved in the profession of news reporting and has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs: -

(2.) SRI C.B. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that once the Respondent No.7, Shailendra Kumar Tripathi was dismissed from service after due inquiry on 01.09.1992 and when his resignation was accepted on 03.08.1992 then the Respondent No.1 (Principal Secretary) could not have set aside both the said orders to re -instate the Respondent No.7 in service vide his order dated 21.04.2005 which is impugned in this writ petition.

(3.) IN this writ petition an interim order dated 30.05.2014 has been passed whereby the operation of the impugned order dated 21.04.2005 has been stayed for the reason that the State Government had passed the impugned order in bad faith.