KATLU Vs. D D C

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Tripathi B.G. Bhai, for the petitioner and Sri Dinesh Pathak for the respondents.

(2.) THE writ petition has been filed against the orders of Consolidation Officer dated 24.9.1997, Settlement Officer, Consolidation dated 18.5.2013 and Deputy Director of Consolidation dated 29.1.2014 by which the recall application filed by Bekaru (now represented by respondents ­ 4 and 5) was allowed and the appeal as well as the revision of the petitioner has been dismissed.

(3.) THE counsel for the petitioner submits that there was inordinate delay in filing the recall application and delay was not liable to be condoned. Bekaru has nothing to do with enhancement of area of original plot no. 186 of the petitioner and he was not aggrieved at all and the recall application filed by him was not maintainable and ought to have been rejected. All these points were specifically raised but neither the appellate authority nor the revisional authority has interfered in the matter.