(1.) HEARD Sri Sri Ramesh Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned Standing Counsel for the State -respondents.
(2.) NONE has appeared for the contesting respondents even though the matter was taken up in the revised list. The writ petition arises out of an objection under section 9A(2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act (for short, the Act), and is directed against the order dated 10.12.1979 passed by respondent no. 1.
(3.) THE dispute in the writ petition pertains to khata no. 388, village Sabayan, tehsil Maharajganj, district Gorakhpur, which consisted of 9 plots. In the basic year record, this khata was recorded in the names of respondent nos. 2 and 3, namely, Nagai and Chander, son of Visheshar.