RAMANAND SHARMA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Shri S.S.Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Kant, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 and learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.4&5.

(2.) All the above writ petitions raise similar questions of facts and questions of laws, which have been heard together and are being decided by a common judgment. In writ petition No.15015 of 2014 the following prayers have been made by the petitioner.:-

(3.) Brief facts giving rise to the petitions are; that Notification under Section 28 of U.P.Awas Evam Vikas Adhiniyam 1965 was issued on 17.07.1997 and Notification under Section 32 of U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Adhiniyam 1965 was issued on 23.12.2004 by which the petitioners land was acquired. There were large number of acquisitions. Certain petitioners had challenged the acquisition. This Court had granted interim order staying dispossession of various other petitioners for which interim order continued till 10.4.13. The award has been declared on 30.12.13. After declaration of the award, the petitioners have come-up in the writ petitions praying for quashing of the Notifications under Section 28 and 32. The petitioner has also prayed for quashing of the award.