GOPAL CHAND AGARWAL Vs. RADHEY NARAIN AGARWAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Shri Mahesh Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Akash Dikshit, who appears for the contesting respondent no. 1, the landlord.

(2.) THIS writ petition arises out of an application under Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting and Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 filed by the contesting respondent for release of shop nos. 685 and 686 on the ground of personal need of the contesting respondent no. 1.

(3.) DURING the pendency of the case, an impleadment application, paper no:55, filed on behalf of the petitioners was rejected by the prescribed authority by the order dated 31.1.2013, impugned in this petition.