LAWS(ALL)-2014-8-519

RAJENDRA PRASAD TIWARI Vs. STATE OF U P

Decided On August 12, 2014
RAJENDRA PRASAD TIWARI Appellant
V/S
STATE OF U P Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Daya Shankar Mishra, learned counsel for the revisionist, Mr Abhay Raj Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned AGA for the State respondent and have gone through the material on record.

(2.) THIS criminal revision is directed against the impugned order dated 23.5.2014 passed by Special Judge (E.C.Act)/Addl. Sessions Judge, Allahabad in Sessions Trial No. 908 of 2001, arising out of Case Crime No. 376 of 1999, under Sections 147,148,149,307 IPC, P.S. Handia, District Allahabad whereby the revisionist has been summoned to face the trial in the aforesaid sections in exercise of power u/s 319 Cr. P. C.

(3.) INITIALLY an FIR vide Case Crime No. 376 of 1999, under Sections 147,148,149,307 IPC was lodged on 29.9.1999 at P.S. Handia, District Allahabad against the revisionist, his father, uncle and one Rajdhari by the opposite party no. 2, in which after investigation, charge sheet was submitted by the Investigating Officer against father and uncle of the revisionist along with two other accused persons on 23.2.2000. Thereafter, the case was committed to the court of Sessions and cognizance in the matter was taken. The trial court examined the informant as P.W. -1, who in his examination -in -chief, has specifically delineated the role of the revisionist herein in the occurrence. Thereafter, the prosecution moved an application (53 B) on 28.2.2005 under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, ''Cr.P.C.') for summoning the revisionist herein as accused in the case. The said application was objected by the father of revisionist Hari Mohan by filing an objection application (63 -B) on 12.7.2007 before the Trial Court. However, the trial court vide order dated 29.8.2007 summoned the revisionist to face the trial for the aforesaid offences. Aggrieved by this order, revisionist preferred Criminal Revision No. 2831 of 2007, which was disposed off by this Court vide order dated 19.9.2007 with the observations extracted here under: -