REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Devi Prasad Misra Appellant

V/S

STATE OF U.P. Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

SMT. VIJAY RANI V. REGIONAL INSPECTRESS OF GIRLS SCHOOLS,REGION -1,MEERUT AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
DAILY RATED CASUAL LABOUR EMPLOYED UNDER PANDT DEPARTMENT VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
BHAGWATI PRASAD BHAGWATI DEVI VS. DELHI STATE MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION:DELHI STATE MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION [REFERRED TO]
DHARWAD DISTT P W D LITERATE DAILY WAGE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [REFERRED TO]
SECRETARY STATE OF KARNATAKA VS. UMADEVI [REFERRED TO]
RAGHUNATH RAI BAREJA VS. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK [REFERRED TO]
OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR VS. DAYANAND [REFERRED TO]
RAGHAVENDRA RAO ETC VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [REFERRED TO]
SATYA PRAKASH VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
RAMESHWAR DAYAL VS. INDIAN RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION CO LTD [REFERRED TO]
M S PATIL VS. GULBARGA UNIVERSITY [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF RAJASTHAN VS. DAYA LAL [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ORISSA VS. MAMATA MOHANTY [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. VARTAK LABOUR UNION [REFERRED TO]
BRIJ MOHAN LAL VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
SHYAM LAL VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
SHYAM LAL VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
SRI RAM CHARAN DAS VS. PYARE LAL [REFERRED TO]
UNIVERSITY OF RAJASTHAN VS. PREM LATA AGARWAL [REFERRED TO]
AMARENDRA KUMAR MOHAPATRA VS. STATE OF ORISSA [REFERRED TO]
SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, CHENNAI VS. THIRU R. GOVINDASWAMY [REFERRED TO]
NAND KUMAR VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
DIRECTOR, PRINTING AND STATIONARY DEPARTMENT, U.P. GOVERNMENT PRESS VS. MOTI LAL [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTARANCHAL VS. RAJENDRA SINGH KANDWAL [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) REQUEST has been made on behalf of petitioner by Sri Kuldeep Pati Tripathi, learned Counsel for the petitioner, to adjourn the matter for today but looking to the order -sheet as also the fact that connected matter, i.e., Service Single No. 3901 of 2012, has already been decided long back on 18.9.2012, this Court is not inclined to adjourn the same. Since learned Counsel for the petitioner has not assisted the Court, I myself have perused the record and proceed to decide the matter finally.

(2.) SRI Aditya Tiwari, Advocate is present for respondents.

(3.) WRIT Petition No. 1925 (SS) of 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the "second petition") has been filed by Devi Prasad Mishra seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing the order dated 10.3.2003, whereby the Director, Local Body has written a letter to Chairman, Nagar Palika Parishad, Sultanpur inquiring as to how and in what manner petitioner has been appointed. He has also sought a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to allow him to discharge duties as Junior Engineer in Nagar Palika Parishad, Sultanpur and to give him all benefits.

Click here to view full judgment.

DEVI PRASAD MISRA Vs. STATE OF U.P.

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address