SUDHA DEVI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the applicants and the learned A.G.A.

(2.) I do not find any merit in this application warranting interference in inherent jurisdiction.

(3.) AT this stage the learned counsel for the applicants made a prayer that the bail application of the applicants in Case Crime No.52 of 2010, under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 409, 504 IPC, P.S. Eka, District Firozabad be ordered to be considered expeditiously, if possible on the same day by the Court below.