VINOD Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A., learned counsel appearing for opposite party no.2 and perused the record.

(2.) THIS criminal revision has been filed against order dated 26.5.2012 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.5, Meerut, by which he has allowed the Criminal Appeal No.2 of 2011 and thereby has declared the opposite party no.2 as juvenile.

(3.) LEARNED A.G.A. and learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2 have defended the impugned order and have submitted that the High -school certificate cannot be disbelieved and there is no illegality in the said appellate order. It has also been submitted that there were contradictions in the statements of Manager of the school and the witnesses, therefore, learned Appellate Court has not committed any error in relying upon the High -school certificate.