PRATIMA MISHRA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This writ petition has been filed questioning the authority of the respondent Higher Education Service Commission to hold selections under Advertisement No. 46 dated 21.3.2014 without appropriately applying the law of reservation collegewise and subjectwise. This matter had been taken up yesterday and the following order was passed:

(2.) Today, an affidavit of the Director of Higher Education has been filed, a copy whereof has been served on the learned counsel for the respondent U.P. Higher Education Service Commission. Alongwith the affidavit which has been sworn by Dr. Naved Bahar Khan, Director Higher Education, who is present in Court, a clarification dated 22.5.2014 has been issued informing the respondent Commission that reservation in terms of the judgments that have been referred to in our order dated 21.5.2014 shall be applied collegewise and subjectwise.

(3.) In view of the said affidavit having been filed by the respondent-Director of Higher Education, we do not find it necessary to issue any direction to the respondents. The respondent Commission shall proceed accordingly to hold selections as per the said corrigendum and the directions contained in the orders passed in Writ Petition No. 4236 of 2014.