(1.) Heard Sri R.P.S.Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
(2.) These three writ petitions involve common questions of facts and inter related legal issues, therefore, as requested and agreed by learned counsel for the parties, I have heard the same collectively and the same are being decided by this common judgment.
(3.) The leading writ petition no.35304 of 2010 (hereinafter referred to as "first petition)" would be referred in extentio for the reasons that pleadings are complete in this writ petition while in other two, i.e. writ petition No.36417 of 2010 (hereinafter referred to as "second petition") and Writ Petition No.50404 of 2010 (hereinafter referred to as "third petition"), the respondents though have filed counter affidavit but the petitioners have not filed rejoinder affidavits. It is, however, agreed between the parties that facts and document in all these petitions being common, the same may be read collectively in each other, as may be required.