KALLU Vs. D.D.C.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SRI Umesh Kumar Srivastava has filed appearance on behalf of respondents -3 to 6. Heard Sri Pradeep Kumar Tiwari for the petitioners and Sri Virendra Pratap Yadav as well as Sri Umesh Kumar Srivastava for the contesting respondents.

(2.) THE writ petition has been filed against the order of the Deputy Director of Consolidation dated 16.11.2013 and the Settlement Officer Consolidation dated 30.8.2013, in the proceeding arising under section 9 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"

(3.) THE Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners as well as the respondents belong to the same family and were descendants of Gangadeen. The land in dispute was the ancestral property as such branches of Parmeshwar as well as Mahavir, both have inherited the property in equal proportion. The name of Parmeshwar was directed to be recorded in the earlier consolidation proceeding and finding contrary to it is illegal.