REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Asifuddin Appellant

V/S

STATE OF U P Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

RAJEEV SHARMA AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
ARUN KUMAR CHAUBEY VS. ADMINISTRATOR,NAGAR PALIKA,MIRZAPUR AND ANOTHER [REFERRED TO]
NAGAR PALIKA PARISAD VS. STATE OF U.P. [REFERRED TO]
RAI SHIVENDRA BAHADUR VS. GOVERNING BODY OF THE NALANDA COLLEGE BIHAR SHARIF [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SAKHARKHERDA EDUCATION SOCIETY SAKHARKHERDA VS. LOK SHIKSHAN SANSATHA:THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
MUNICIPAL BOARD KANNAUJ VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
SITARAM SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED U P STATE SUGAR CORPORATION LIMITED VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
KUMARI SHRILEKHA VIDYARTHI VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
SUBHASH PHOTOGRAPHICS VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH VS. GANESH WOOD PRODUCTS [REFERRED TO]
DELHI SCIENCE FORUM NATIONAL TELECOM FEDERATION OF TELECOM EMPLOYEES VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
KRISHNAN KAKKANTH VS. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA [REFERRED TO]
CYAN PRAKASH VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF PUNJAB VS. RAM LUBHAYA BAGGA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ORISSA VS. CHANDRA SEKHAR MISHRA [REFERRED TO]
UGAR SUGAR WORKS LIMITED VS. DELHI ADMINISTRATION [REFERRED TO]
BALCO EMPLOYEES UNION REGD VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH VS. PADAM DEVI [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF RAJASTHAN VS. LATA ARUN [REFERRED TO]
SECRETARY STATE OF KARNATAKA VS. UMADEVI [REFERRED TO]
EKTA SHAKTI FOUNDATION VS. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI [REFERRED TO]
SURENDRA PRASAD TEWARI VS. UTTAR PRADESH RAJYA KRISHI UTPADAN MANDI PARISHAD [REFERRED TO]
RAM SINGH VIJAY PAL SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [REFERRED TO]
SATYA PRAKASH VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
MD ASHIF VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
H S RAJASHEKARA VS. STATE BANK OF MYSORE [REFERRED TO]
RISHI KUMAR GUPTA VS. NANOOMAL YADAV [REFERRED TO]
HAR PAL VS. STATE OF U P [REFERRED TO]
ARUN KUMAR CHOUBEY VS. ADMINISTRATOR NAGAR PALIKA MIRZAPUR [REFERRED TO]
SUMAN VERMA VS. SPECIAL SECRETARY NAGAR VIKASH ANUBHAG 6 GOVERNMENT OF U P LUCKNOW [REFERRED TO]
MOHD TAYOOB LAHERWAL VS. STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF U.P. VS. KAMLESH KUMAR TRIPATHI [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Ashok Khare, learned senior counsel assisted by Sri Siddharth Khare, counsel for the petitioners and Sri Ashok Kumar Pandey, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri J.N.Maurya, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for state respondents and Sri Jai Bahadur Singh for respondents no.3 and 4. Other learned counsels for the petitioners appearing in different writ petitions have adopted the arguments advanced by Sri Khare. Sri Naval Singh, learned counsel appears for the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 42526 of 2012, Sri Ashok Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appears for the petitioner in Writ Petitions No. 40433 of 2012, 45634 of 2012 and 45638 of 2012, Sri S.S. Srivastav, learned counsel appears for petitioner in Writ Petition No. 20930 of 2013. Sri Rastrapati Khare appears for the petitioner in Writ Petition No.61026 of 2012 and Sri Satya Prakash Mishra appears for petitioner in Writ Petition No. 47937 of 2012.

(2.) SRI Ashok Khare submits as under :

(3.) SRI Rashtrapati Khare, submits that the petitioners are daily wagers engaged on contract basis and they have been serving since long and therefore, they cannot be ousted in one stroke without any prior intimation and opportunity. He relied upon the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of H.S. Rajashekhara Vs. State of Mysore, JT (2011) 13 SC 325, judgment of this Court in the case of State of U.P. and others Vs. Kamlesh Kumsar Tripathi and another (2012) 4 UPLBEC 3245 and judgment of High Court of Jammu and Kashmir in the case of Tayub Leharwal Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir, (2007) 1 LLJ 199.

Click here to view full judgment.

ASIFUDDIN Vs. STATE OF U P

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address