REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Kunj Bihari Lal Radheyshyam Appellant

V/S

COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAX Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

M/S. CHUNI LAL PARSHADI LAL V. COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX [REFERRED TO]
STAR PAPER MILLS LTD. V. CST [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MADRAS VS. RADIO AND ELECTRICALS LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
NIRMALJIT SINGH HOON VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [REFERRED TO]
CHUNNI LAL PARSHADI LAL VS. COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX U P LUCKNOW [REFERRED TO]
JACSONS THEVARA VS. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE [REFERRED TO]
TOOLSIDASS JEWRAJ VS. ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS [REFERRED TO]
ROSHAN DEEN VS. PREETI LAL [REFERRED TO]
RAM CHANDRA SINGH VS. SAVITRI DEVI [REFERRED TO]
ASHOK LEYLAND LIMITED VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [REFERRED TO]
I T C LIMITED VS. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE NEW DELHI [REFERRED TO]
MOHAN LAL VS. GRAIN CHAMBER LTD [REFERRED TO]
BRIGHT BROS. (PVT.) LTD VS. J. K. SAYANI [REFERRED TO]
MILK FOOD LTD. VS. COMMISSIONER VAT [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Rakesh Ranjan Agarwal, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Suyash Agarwal, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri B.K. Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. Revision is admitted on the following questions of law:

(2.) WITH the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this revision is finally heard.

(3.) AGGRIEVED with the assessment order dated 31st March, 2011, the applicant filed First Appeal No. 243/2011 before the Additional Commissioner Grade -H, (Appeals) Commercial Tax, Mirzapur who dismissed the appeal vide order dated 21st June, 2011 observing that the aforesaid six Forms -F were not issued by the prescribed authority to M/s. Rajdhani Traders, Delhi and M/s. Rakhika Enterprises, New Delhi rather these forms are either stolen or forged and as such no benefit of these form can be given to the applicant.

Click here to view full judgment.

KUNJ BIHARI LAL RADHEYSHYAM Vs. COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAX

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address