KAILASH DEVI Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Standing Counsel.

(2.) The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:-

(3.) It has been contended by the counsel for the petitioner that the order passed by the respondent no. 2 is bad in the eyes of law. All the material having not been considered, the said order is arbitrary and biased. It has further been argued that Parashuram, whose case stands on the same footing, has been granted central pension whereas the petitioner has been refused the same. Perusal of the impugned order shows that the case of Parashuram Singh was based on the ground of his claimed jail suffering whereas the claim of the petitioner was on the ground of underground suffering of her husband.