NAND LAL Vs. D D C

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri K.C. Kishan Srivastava for the petitioner and Sri Dan Bahadur Yadav and Sri Manoj Kumar Yadav for the respondents.

(2.) THE writ petition has been filed against the order of Deputy Director of Consolidation dated 11.02.2014 by which he has shifted his place of land reserved for general abadi as well as land reserved for the purposes of village potters towards boundary of the village and carved out a chak road up to it.

(3.) THE counsel for the petitioner submits that land for extension of general abadi was reserved on the application of the petitioner but the petitioner was not impleaded as party in the appeals filed by respondent -2. However, he for the first time impleaded the petitioner in the revisions as party. Respondent -2 has no locus standi in the matter and the revision ought to have been dismissed. The land reserved for general abadi was reserved on the application of the petitioner which was lying in front of his old abadi, however it has been illegally shifted from this place due to which the petitioner has been deprived from his abadi.