REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Ram Chet Verma Appellant

V/S

STATE OF U P Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

B.N. NAGARJUN VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [REFERRED TO]
LAL BAHADUR SHASTRI SMARAK JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL AND ANOTHER VS. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MYSORE VS. S V NARAYANAPPA [REFERRED TO]
R N NANJUNDAPPA VS. T THIMMIAH [REFERRED TO]
H C PUTTASWAMY VS. HONBLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT BANGALORE [REFERRED TO]
ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR VS. CHANDER SHEKHER:CHANDER SHEKHER [REFERRED TO]
M S MUDHOL VS. S D HALEGKAR [REFERRED TO]
BUDDHI NATH CHAUDHARY VS. ABAHI KUMAR [REFERRED TO]
YOGESH KUMAR VS. GOVERNMENT OF NTC DELHI [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF KARNATAKA VS. KGSD CANTEEN EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION [REFERRED TO]
MOHD SARTAJ VS. STATE OF U P [REFERRED TO]
SECRETARY STATE OF KARNATAKA VS. UMADEVI [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MANIPUR VS. Y TOKEN SINGH [REFERRED TO]
PRAMOD KUMAR VS. U P SECONDARY EDUCATION SERVICES COMMISSION [REFERRED TO]
REGIONAL MANAGER CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA VS. MADHULIKA GURUPRASAD DAHIR [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ORISSA VS. MAMATA MOHANTY [REFERRED TO]
ASHA SAXENA VS. S K CHAUDHARI [REFERRED TO]
GOPAL DUBEY VS. DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS MAHARAJGANI AND ANOTHER [REFERRED TO]
SUSHIL KUMAR DWIVEDI VS. BASIC SHIKSHA ADHIKARI BANDA [REFERRED TO]
COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT VS. STATE OF U P [REFERRED TO]
MOHD ILIYAS VS. DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS [REFERRED TO]
RAM SURAT YADAV VS. STATE OF U P [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE Kisan Rashtriya Junior High School Gohanna, District Ambedkarnagar/Faizabad is a Junior High School recognized and under the grant -in -aid. The provisions of U.P. Recognized Basic Schools (Junior High Schools Recruitment and Condition of Service) Rules 1978 are applicable for appointment and other service conditions of assistant teachers.

(2.) THE Committee of Management published an advertisement on 22.12.1995 in local newspaper for appointment of two assistant teachers. The petitioners along with others applied and the Selection Committee recommended the petitioners for appointment on the post of assistant teachers on 13.1.1995. The District Basic Education Officer Faizabad (herein after referred to as BSA) vide orders dated 12.12.1995 granted approval to the petitioners and accordingly appointment letters was issued by the Committee of Management and on 13.12.1995 the petitioners resumed their duties and are working since then.

(3.) THE Committee of Management has filed counter affidavit and they support the petitioners' case and further, it has been stated, that on 7.12.1988 two additional sections in Class VI and VII was permitted by the B.S.A. and the strength for assistant teachers, on account of additional sections, was enhanced from 5 to 7 as the criteria for teacher per section is 1.5 teachers. The petitioner was appointed in anticipation of approval of the additional posts.

Click here to view full judgment.

RAM CHET VERMA Vs. STATE OF U P

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address