RAKESH KUMAR Vs. RRAMOD KUMAR GUPTA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Alok Tiwari, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rajesh Gupta, who appears for the respondent. Petitioner is a tenant of a shop of which respondent is a landlord. The landlord applied for its release under section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for the bona fide need of his two sons Vimal Gupta and Sanjay Gupta. The release application has been allowed by the prescribed authority and the judgment and order has been affirmed by the Appellate Court.

(2.) Aggrieved by the judgments and orders of the Court below allowing the release application, tenant has preferred this writ petition.

(3.) Learned Counsel for the petitioner has raised the following three points.