SHYAMA NATH TRIPATHI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Santosh Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.

(2.) THE petitioner alongwith six other persons was selected as Assistant Teacher in the academic session 1972 -1973 and the approval was granted. On the direction of Deputy Director of Education, District Inspector of Schools, Pratapgarh directed the Principal to send the names of the teachers working in the year 1972 -1973 so that their services may be extended for the next session i.e. 1973 -1974. The name of the petitioner was not sent by the principal, the petitioner approached the District Inspector of Schools, Pratapgarh and the D.I.O.S. Vide order dated 31.08.1974 extended the services of the petitioner till 30.06.1975. However the said order was stayed as the Committee of Management approached this Court and the Writ Petition No. 133 of 1980 filed by the Committee of Management was finally decided by judgment dated 04.09.1985 clearly observing that the petitioner never worked beyond 1972 -73. The extract of the judgment is as follows: -

(3.) DURING the pendency of the said writ petition the other teachers appointed alongwith the petitioner were regularized in 1976. The petitioner did not continue after 1972 -73.