JAIPAL SINGH Vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Dhirendra Bahadur Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Santosh Srivastava, who has filed caveat on behalf of respondent no. 4, the sole contesting respondent. With consent of the parties this petition is being decided finally without calling for a counter.

(2.) The facts relevant for deciding the controversy involved in the writ petition are as follows:-

(3.) Instead of merely recording the names of the two brothers, the sons of Tika Ram over the chak no. 293 and further that each was entitled to half share each therein, the Consolidation Authorities in proceedings under Rule 109A proceeded to partition this chak by metes and bounds. In such partition by metes and bound, the petitioner appears to be aggrieved as he is not satisfied by the portion of the chak no. 293, which has been allotted in his share.