GULAB SINGH Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the applicant -complainant and learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the judgment of the Trial Court.

(2.) THIS application for leave to appeal has been filed against a judgment and order dated 29.3.2014 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 1 Chitrakoot in ST No. 107 of 2008 whereby all the accused respondents have been acquitted for the offence punishable under sections 147, 323/148, 308/149 IPC, PS Karvi, district Chitrakoot.

(3.) THE Trial Judge has acquitted the accused -respondents on the grounds that the informant -appellant has admitted in his cross -examination that the accused persons came from different directions and belaboured him. Two unknown persons had assaulted him and one of them may have thrown brickbats or he may have received injury by brickbats or by fall. According to appellant -complainant himself the injury was not dangerous to life and it was simple in nature and that he was convinced that the accused persons had committed the crime. He did not even see whether the named accused persons had participated in the crime or not.