SANT RAM Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Shri Umesh Chandra Vishwakarma, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

(2.) THE petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the orders dated 4.10.2013 passed by the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Lucknow, Division Lucknow, the order dated 19.8.2013 passed by the Tehsildar, Mishrikh, Sitapur and the order dated 31.10.2006 whereby the order of the Tehsildar has been incorporated in the revenue record pertaining to Khata No. 327 expunging the order dated 21.2.1988 passed by the Revenue Inspector. 3. The fact of the case in brief as follows. Plot No. 341, area 0.717 hectare situated at village Dhakhiya Kala, Pargana Chandra, Tehsil Mishrikh, District Sitapur was recorded in the name of Gajodhar son of Kallu in the basic year Khatauni. On the death of Gajodhar, the name of Raghubar, stated to be the real brother of Gajodhar, was entered in the revenue record by way of PA -11 on 21.2.1988.

(3.) AGGRIEVED by the dismissal of the recall application a revision was preferred before the opposite party no. 2, Additional Commissioner (Administration). The opposite party no. 2 by the impugned order dated 4.10.2013 has directed the petitioners to file an appropriate application under Section 33/39 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, which order has been impugned in the writ petition.