HARI RAM Vs. DDC

JUDGEMENT

(1.) COUNTER and rejoinder affidavits filed today in Court, are taken on record.

(2.) I have heard Shri R.S. Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri C.P. Dwivedi, learned Advocate, who has filed caveat on behalf of respondent no. 2 Smt. Ranju Maurya, who has been described as the contesting respondent in the array of the parties.

(3.) THE petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the orders dated 10.12.2012 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation in revision no. 880 under Section 41 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act (Ranju vs. Hari Ram and Others) and the order dated 22.2.2014 whereby the Deputy Director of Consolidation, has dismissed the restoration application filed by the petitioner Hari Ram.