ASHWINI RAI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Ashok Khare, Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Siddharth Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri D.K. Singh, learned counsel for respondents and perused the record. The petitioner claimed compassionate appointment but having failed to obtain the same, came to this Court in Writ Petition No. 50 of 2004, in which an interim order was passed on 5.9.2005, which reads as under:

(2.) PURSUANT to the aforesaid interim order dated 5.9.2005, respondents granted compassionate appointment to the petitioner vide order dated 28.4.2006. Subsequently, the writ petition was dismissed on 7.5.2007 holding that petitioner was not entitled for compassionate appointment after 15 years from the date of death of his father. The order passed by this Court dismissing writ petition on merits reads as under:

(3.) THEN the petitioner facing termination, preferred special appeal No. 753 of 2007 wherein an interim order was passed on 1.6.2007 as under: