REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Natik Party Appellant

V/S

UNION OF INDIA Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

CHARAN LAL SAHU V. UOI [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF BOMBAY VS. R M D CHI MARBAUGWALA ADVOCATE GENERAL OF MYSORE INTERVENER [REFERRED TO]
HAMDARD DAWAKHANA KALIPADA DEB LAKSHMAN SHRIPATI LTPURE ALIAS LAKSHMAN SHRI PATI IMPORE A B CHOUDHRI VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
ATIABARI TEA CO LIMITED KHAYERBARI TEA CO LIMITED H P BARUA HASIMARA TEA COMPANY LIMITED MOABUND TEA COMPANY LIMITED VS. STATE OF ASSAM:STATE OF ASSAM:STATE OF ASSAM:STATE OF ASSAM:STATE OF ASSAM [REFERRED TO]
SADIQ ALI P KAKKAN VS. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA NEW DELHI:CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER MADRAS [REFERRED TO]
KANHIYA LAL OMAR VS. R K TRIVEDI [REFERRED TO]
ATAM PRAKASH VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
LIC OF INDIA VS. CONSUMER EDUCATION AND RESEARCH CENTRE [REFERRED TO]
SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY VS. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
ZAMEER AHMED LATIFUR REHMAN SHEIKH VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
NOIDA ENTREPRENEURS ASSOCIATION VS. NOIDA [REFERRED TO]
DESIYA MURPOKKU DRAVIDA KAZHAGAM VS. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
SELVI J. JAYALALITHAA VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Short counter affidavit filed today on behalf of opposite parties Nos. 2 and 3, counter affidavit as well as additional affidavit filed today on behalf of opposite party No.4 and rejoinder affidavit to the short counter affidavit filed on behalf of opposite party Nos. 2 and 3, are admitted to record.

(2.) With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, we proceed to hear the matter finally.

(3.) Heard Mr. C.B. Pandey, assisted by Ms Mariya Kirmani, Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Manish Mathur, Counsel for the opposite parties Nos. 2 and 3 and Mr. Akhilesh Kalra, assisted by Mr. Piyush Agarwal, Counsel for the opposite party No.4.

Click here to view full judgment.

NATIK PARTY Vs. UNION OF INDIA

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address