ANTOO Vs. DDC

JUDGEMENT

(1.) I have heard Sri Ajay Kumar Yadav learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.K.Singh learned counsel for the contesting opposite party as also their vendees who have been permitted to intervene in this writ petition vide order dated 8.9.2011.

(2.) THE petitioner is chak holder No.13 while the respondent nos.6 and 7 are the holders of chak No.1521. The dispute in the writ petition relates to allotment of chaks.

(3.) A perusal of the grounds of revision reveals that the grievance of the petitioner was that plot No.1459 wherein existed his Kachcha house, had been excluded from his chak. It is further revealed by a perusal of the grounds of revision that the petitioner wanted that the entire area of plot Nos.1459 and 1464 be allotted in his chak.