RAVI KUMAR Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) By these proceedings the petitioner has sought to question the legality of the definition of the expression "family unit" in clause-10 of the Brochure issued by state owned oil companies for the selection of dealers for Regular & Rural Retail Outlets. Clause-10 of the brochure provides for a disqualification and, insofar it is material, provides as follows:

(2.) Under the above condition, a multiple dealership norm has been put into place, under which any other member of the family unit should not hold a dealership, distributorship or a Letter of Intent for the allotment of a dealership or a distributorship of an oil company. In other words only one retail outlet dealership or distributorship of an oil company would be allotted to a family unit. In the case of an applicant who is married, the family unit has been defined to consist of the individual, his or her spouse and unmarried sons and daughters. In the case of an unmarried person, the family unit is defined to include parents and unmarried brothers and sisters.

(3.) According to the submission of the petitioner, this is a discriminatory provision and violates Article 14 of the Constitution since parents of an unmarried applicant have been brought within the purview of the expression 'family unit', whereas, in the case of a married individual, the parents are excluded.