LAWS(ALL)-2014-4-203

ANITA SONKAR Vs. SHAKUNTALA MISRA

Decided On April 02, 2014
ANITA SONKAR Appellant
V/S
Shakuntala Misra Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Adnan Ahmad learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri V.N.Singh learned counsel for the respondent and perused the record.

(2.) By means of the present revision; revisionist has challenged the judgment and decree dated 29.5.2012 passed in S.C.C. Suit No.01/2009 (Shakuntala Mishra Vs. Smt. Anita Sonkar) by Small Causes Court/ Additional District Judge, Court No.1, Barabanki.

(3.) Factual matrix of the present case is that in village Nahar Colony Mohan Nagar, City, Pergana and Tehsil Nawabganj, District-Barabanki, a house consisting of one room was given to the tenant/revisionist on tenancy for 11 months by virtue of an agreement dated 1.1.2001 (unregistered) entered between Smt. Shakuntala Misra (the land lady) and Smt. Anita Sonkar. The tenant/revisionist was defaulter as she had not paid the rent as agreed between the parties, therefore, by means of a notice dated 24.12.2008 plaintiff/respondent terminated tenancy and claim damages. For use and occupation of the premises at the rate of Rs.700/- for month.