RAM AUTAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Vinod Kumar Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioners.

(2.) Consequently, framing the said question be answered by this Court an order was passed on 25.2.2014 calling upon the learned Standing Counsel to furnish the original records before the Court for the purpose of consideration of the issue so raised with a direction that the no confidence motion which was scheduled for 26.2.2014 may be held but the results shall not be declared.

(3.) The members, who had tabled the no confidence motion, had been made party respondents in the writ petition and they were also directed to be served. An affidavit of service has been filed indicating service of notice on the respondents No. 8 to 10 and refusal by the respondents No. 5 to 7.