YATENDRA KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Pankaj Dubey, learned Counsel for the petitioners.

(2.) The petitioners claim benefit of getting back the land on the ground that since in the case of Harkaran Singh v. State of U.P. and others, 2011 6 ADJ 755, the entire Notification has been quashed, therefore, the land deserves to be returned to the petitioners.

(3.) We are unable to agree with this proposition for the simple reason that this issue about the impact of the said decision which was under reference was squarely dealt with by the Full Bench decision in the case of Gajraj and others v. State of U.P. and others, 2011 11 ADJ 1, alongwith the issue relating to those farmers who had filed writ petitions that were dismissed and where those who had not filed their writ petitions where the Court in Paragraph Nos. 480 and 481 recorded findings which are extracted herein below: