SHYODAYAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Udit Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri S.C. Dwivedi for the respondents. Sri Chandra submits that a similar writ petition has been entertained being Writ Petition No. 28131 of 2014 in relation to the same notification arising out of proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

(2.) We have perused the said order and it proceeds on the argument that the issue that the land was notified for one purpose and is being utilized for another has not been considered in the judgment of the Apex Court dated 6.12.2013.

(3.) We are unable to agree with this argument for the simple reason that the Apex Court with regard to the same notification has held as follows: