BRIJESH SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Mr I. K. Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and Sri B. P. Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2.

(2.) PETITIONER moved an application before the Judicial Magistrate, District Chitrakoot under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. seeking registration of the Criminal Case against the opposite party no. 2 saying that the respondent no. 2 had secured employment on the post of Principal on the basis of forged and inapplicable documents disclosing wrong information. This application was heard and thereafter dismissed vide order dated 5.12.2013 passed by learned Incharge Judicial Magistrate, Mau, Chitrakoot. It is this order which is subject matter of challenge before this Court.

(3.) HON 'ble Apex Count in Aleeque Padamsee Vs Union of India and another,2007 6 AllCriC 171 has held that if any person is aggrieved by inaction of police official in registering the FIR the modalities contained in Section 190 read with Section 200 Cr.P.C. should be adopted and it has further held that writ petition in such cases should not be entertained. The relevant extract of the judgement are reproduced as under: -