SHYAM LAL Vs. ADITYA PRASAD JALLAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ORDERS on Delay Condonation Application No.271548 of 2013, Substitution Application No.271552 of 2013 and Abatement Application No.290150 of 2011.

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the appellant as well as learned counsel for the respondents were heard on the above three applications. The above noted Abatement Application was filed by the appellant Purushottam Jalan for the reason that proposed respondent Satya Narain Jallan died on 8.12.2008. Aforesaid Satya Narain Jalan was to be substituted as respondent 1/1.

(3.) IN the Substitution Application, it has been prayed by the appellant that the heirs of Satya Narain Jallan 1/1, namely, Vimal Jalan, Vinod Jalan and Manoj Jalan be substituted as respondents as R -1/1/1, R -1/1/2, R -1/1/3. Section 5 Limitation Act Application appended along with the Substitution Application and the affidavit of Ajay Kumar Agarwal in support of Section 5 Limitation Act Application reason for the cause of delay in paragraph -3 as under: -