REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

SARVESH KUMAR SHARMA Appellant

V/S

STATION DIRECTOR AND APPELLATE AUTHORITY, NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

J.K.COTTON SPINNING AND WEAVING MILLS V. JAGANNATH AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF RAJASTHAN V. B.K.MEENA [REFERRED TO]
R.K.KAPOOR V. ZONAL MANAGER (NORTH),FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANR. [REFERRED TO]
NAND KISHORE PRASAD V. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]
SHIV PRAKASH RAI V. STATE OF UP. AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]
VIRENDRA SHARMA V. STATE OF UP. AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH VS. S SREE RAMA RAO [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. H C GOEL [REFERRED TO]
SYED YAKOOB VS. K S RADHAKRISHNAN [REFERRED TO]
RAILWAY BOARD REPRESENTING THE UNION OF INDIA VS. NIRANJAN SINGH [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ASSAM VS. MOHAN CHANDRA KALITA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH VS. CHITRA VENKATA RAO [REFERRED TO]
L D JAISINGHANI VS. NARAINDAS N PUNJABI [REFERRED TO]
BHAGAT RAM VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
GLAXO LABORATORIES INDIA LIMITED VS. PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT MEERUT [REFERRED TO]
M PAUL ANTHONY VS. BHARAT GOLD MINES LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
BANK OF INDIA VS. DEGALA SURYANARAYANA [REFERRED TO]
KUMAON MANDAL VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED VS. GIRJA SHANKAR PANT [REFERRED TO]
CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR UNITED COMMERCIAL BANK VS. P C KAKKAR [REFERRED TO]
LALIT POPLI VS. CANARA BANK [REFERRED TO]
GOPAL DAS RAWAT VS. U P STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONS [REFERRED TO]
BABOO LAL DUBEY VS. REGIONAL MANAGER U P S R T C ALLAHABAD [REFERRED TO]
AMULYA RATAN MUKHERJEE VS. DEPUTY CHIEF MECHANICAL ENGINEER EASTERN RLY [REFERRED TO]
P B ROCHO VS. UNION OF INDIA UOI [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) By means of this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the order of his dismissal from service dated 20.9.2000 as passed by the respondent No. 2, (Annexure-9 to the writ petition) and the order of Appellate Authority/ respondent No. 1, dated 5.1.2001 (Annexure-11 to the writ petition) by which petitioner's appeal was dismissed and the penalty of dismissal from service was confirmed.

(2.) Sri Manish Goel, learned Counsel in support of the writ petition and Sri V.K.S. Chaudhary, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri C.S. Singh, learned Advocate in opposition thereof have been heard. Parties Counsel have advanced their arguments at quite length and they have taken the Court about the demerit/merit in the enquiry proceedings and thereafter the scope of enquiry by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to interfere in the enquiry proceedings and the result based thereupon. In view of the aforesaid this Court is to consider and decide that whether on the fact of the present case interference in the enquiry proceedings and the punishment so awarded is to be made or not.

(3.) For the disposal of the writ petition the facts in brief, as stated in the writ petition, will be useful to be summarised.

Click here to view full judgment.

SARVESH KUMAR SHARMA Vs. STATION DIRECTOR AND APPELLATE AUTHORITY NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address