KAILASH JAISWAL Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. N. Srivastava, J. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 27th July, 2004 passed by the District Judge, Gorakhpur.

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner urged that impugned order was passed behind the back of petitioner without any application of the parties. Deputy Commissioner (Administration), Trade Tax, Gorakhpur at whose behest impugned order was passed is neither plaintiff nor defendant. The District Judge, Gorakhpur erred in law, acted illegally without jurisdiction and passed impugned order even without affording any opportunity of hearing to Opp. Party and prayed to quash impugned order.

(3.) RULES 28 to 33 of Chapter III of General RULES Civil relates to entertaining applications in the Civil Court which make clear that applications may be presented to Munsarim of the Court which could be received on any day other than an authorized holiday between 10. 30 a. m. and such hour as may be fixed by the Court; provided that an application or petition presented after such hour and before 4 p. m. may be received on the ground, if any, of limitation or other urgent reason. Every application shall at the time of presentation bear the name and also full signature or thumb-mark of the person actually presenting the same together with the date of presentation and no application shall be received from any person other than party himself, his pleader or his recognized agent as required under Chapter XXV or by a registered clerk of pleader registered under Chapter-V of General RULES Civil. In case any application is received by post, it shall be returned to sender to be presented according to law.