REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

AMARAWATI Appellant

V/S

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

NOORMOHD. V. STATE OF U. P. [REFERRED TO]
A K GOPALAN VS. STATE OF MADRAS OPPOSITE PARTY; UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
MANEKA GANDHI VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
FRANCIS CORALIE MULLIN VS. ADMINISTRATOR UNION TERRITORY OF DELHI [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL REHMAN ANTULAY VS. R S NAYAK [REFERRED TO]
UNNI KRISHNAN J P VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
JOGINDER KUMAR VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
RAJ DEO SHARMA VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
KANS RAJ VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
RAMESH CHANDRA KAPIL V. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD [REFERRED TO]
PRAMOD KUMAR VS. SADHNA RANI [REFERRED TO]
HIDIYAT HUSSAIN KHAN VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
VINOD NARAIN VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This Full Bench is constituted to consider the following questions :

(2.) In the case of Dr. Vinod Narain (Writ Petition No. 3643 of 1992) it was held : "For the reasons recorded separately this Full Bench unanimously holds that in exercise of power under Article 226 of the Constitution, while issuing direction and command to the Magistrate or the Court of Session as the case may be, to consider the bail application time schedule for concluding the bail proceedings cannot be fixed. Consequently, the decision rendered in Dr. Hidayat Hussain Khan v. State of U. P., (1992 Cri LJ 3534) is overruled and the decision rendered in Writ Petition No. 919 of 1992 (reported in 1994 All LJ 50) Noor Mohd. v. State of U. P. is upheld."

(3.) In the same judgment Hon'ble Palok Basu, J. observed (in paragraph 183) :

Click here to view full judgment.

AMARAWATI Vs. STATE OF U P

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address