RAVI NARAIN MALVIYA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsels for the parties. Perused the record of the case.

(2.) FACTS of the case, required for the adjudication of the issues raised in this petition are not in dispute and briefly stated as follows:

(3.) IN para 6 of the writ petition it is stated that petitioners continued to be recorded as owners of the land in question and this averment has not been disputed vide para 5 of the counter -affidavit (sworn by Gyan Prakash Srivastava filed on behalf of the contesting respondents).