JAYANTI PRASAD SHARMA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) -Heard learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) THIS writ petition is directed against an order dated 2nd January, 2004, passed by the appellate court admitting a document as additional evidence in exercise of powers under Order XLI, Rule 27.

(3.) ON the above finding it cannot be said either the appellate court has not applied its mind or the appellate court has not given reasons.