SANDEEP KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) K. N. Ojha, J. Heard learned Counsel for the revisionists and learned AGA and have gone through the order dated 28- 11-2003 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 17, district Meerut, in Sessions Trial No. 1294 of 2000, State v. Sanjeev and others, under Sections 147, 148, 149,323, 452 and 307 I. P. C. police station Parikshitgarh, district Meerut.

(2.) BY impugned order dated 28-11-2003 the application 29-B moved by the accused-revisionists to try the case of both occurrence as separate sessions trials was rejected on the ground that the first occurrence is connected with the second occurrence and joint trial of both the offences can be made together.

(3.) A perusal of Section 219 of Cr. P. C. shows that this section contemplates that when a person is accused of more offences than one of the same kind committed within space of 12 months from the first to the last occurrence such offences, whether in respect of the same person or not, he may be charged with, and tried at one trial for, any number of them not exceeding three.