ADHYA PRASAD Vs. DEOKI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS revision has been preferred against the order dated 18-3-1999 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Allahabad Division.

(2.) HEARD the learned Counsel for the parties on the point of admission and perused the relevant papers on file.

(3.) A perusal of file and orders reveal that the revision was preferred before the Commissioner, Allahabad Division, against the order dated 5-10-1995 passed by the CRO, Pratapgarh and in due course of time to stood decided by the Additional Commissioner's order dated 18-3-1999 and the present revision against the Additional Commissioner's impugned order has been preferred before the Board. Apparently the instant revision before the Board has been filed by the same person who has preferred the revision before the Commissioner against the order dated 5-10-1995 passed by the CRO and the provisions of U.P. Act No. 20 of 1997 shall be applicable to the facts and circumstances of the instant case. Thus, it is clear that the revision has been filed before the Board after enforcement of U.P. Act No. 20 of 1997 which came into force on 14-10-1997. In the circumstances I find force in the submission made by the learned Counsel for the otherside and the case law referred to above is fully applicable to the facts and circumstances of the instant case.