RAM SURAT Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY the Court. -Heard learned Counsel for the appellants and learned A.G.A.

(2.) THE impugned appeal was preferred by the above appellants against their conviction under Section 302/34 I.P.C. and Section 323/34 I.P.C. and sentence of life imprisonment and 6 months' R.I. awarded to them by the trial Court. The sentences are to run concurrently.

(3.) IN the past also Bishram had lodged a report against Harbhan Singh and others under Sections 504 and 506 I.P.C. about a dispute in respect of this very land. The said incident occurred when the informant was raising a house upon the disputed land. According to the prosecution the land was earmarked for Harijans and was occupied by the family members and others belonging to the community of the informant.