ANIL KUMAR Vs. NIYAT PRADHIKARI CHANDAUSI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. P. Mehrotra, J. Shri S. C. Tripathi, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri P. K. Singhal, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 2 are present.

(2.) IN view of the office report dated 11-12-2003, service of notice on respondent Nos. 3 and 4/1 to 4/8 is held to be sufficient. It may be mentioned that respondent Nos. 4/1 to 4/8 have been impleaded as proforma-respondents in the writ petition.

(3.) THE dispute relates to a shop, the details whereof are given in the release application referred to hereinafter. THE said shop has hereinafter been referred to as "the disputed shop".