DURJAN KUMARI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) A. S. Tripathi, J. This revision is directed against the order dated 4-11-1993 passed by the Special Judge, Azamgarh, rejecting the application (Paper No. 141-B) for summoning the Ballistic Expert in Sessions Trial No. 32) of 1992, State v. Doodhnath and others.

(2.) I have heard learned Counsel for the revisionist and learned A. O. A. for the State and perused the record.

(3.) IN the circumstances as let out in this revision it appears necessary that the Ballistic Expert be examined and cross-examined in Court to clarify the ambiguity as pointed out and as also comes out from the report of the expert. Therefore, the revision deserves to be allowed.