NAJMUL Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) K. C. Bhargava, J. This revision is directed against the order, dated 20-7-19-H passed by the III Additional Sessions Judge, Pratapgarh.

(2.) THE short point which requires decision in the present case is as to whether the ill Additional Sessions Judge was justified in deciding the age of the applicants who are alleged to be juvenile.

(3.) ON the other hand learned Additional Government Advocate has argued that the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge does not suffer from any illegality or irregularity.